The rose by another name

The-rose-by-another-name
The rose by another name
A large crowd gathers for the rally outside the Lackawanna County Courthouse in Scranton Pa., Sunday Feb. 19, 2017, to focus on protecting the Affordable Care Act, Medicare and Medicaid. (Jason Farmer/The Times & Tribune via AP) more >

View Comments Print

By THE WASHINGTON TIMES – – Sunday, February 19, 2017

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The courts continue to wrestle with homosexual nuptials and the meaning of “participation.” The Washington state Supreme Court last week held that a florist in Richland, Wash., had no right in the law to refuse to provide flowers to two men for their same-sex wedding because to participate in such a rite would violate her deeply held religious beliefs.

The state court ruled unanimously that the florist, Barronelle Stutzman, violated Washington’s anti-discrimination law by refusing custom to the men, even though she argued that being compelled to do so would violate those religious beliefs. Mrs. Stutzman said she had sold flowers to Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed before, and knew they were of the homosexual persuasion, but told them that she couldn’t supply flowers for their nuptials because same-sex marriage is contrary to Christian beliefs.

Mrs. Stutzman’s floral arrangements, the court held, didn’t constitute protected free speech, but neither does providing those flowers to a same-sex wedding represent an endorsement of it. “As [Mrs.] Stutzman acknowledged at deposition,” the justices wrote, “providing flowers for a wedding between Muslims would not necessarily constitute an endorsement of Islam, nor would providing flowers for an atheist couple endorse atheism.”

Mrs. Stutzman’s lawyer, Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom, argued that providing the flowers constituted participation in the wedding. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will,” she said. “Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority. They are constitutional guarantees.” She said Mrs. Stutzman, who was fined $1,000 and a dollar costs, will appeal the decision to a federal court.

Since the bridal couple could have bought flowers elsewhere, Mrs. Stutzman rightly thinks the homosexual lobby wants to make an example of her to send a message to other florists, bakers and photographers that they have no right to decide whether they want to participate in gay nuptials. In fact, a similar case in pending now before the U.S. Supreme Court. A baker in Lakewood, Colo., refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, and a decision in that case could have implications for others. The baker, Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop is represented by Alliance Defending Freedom as well.

“No one should have to choose between their faith and livelihood,” says Alan Sears of the alliance. “Freedom cannot survive in an environment of coercion.”

Copyright © 2017 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide

The rose by another name

CNN learns a hard lesson

The rose by another name

Cartoons: Tooning into President Trump

The rose by another name

Hillary’s server continues to haunt her

The rose by another name

Cartoons: Obama Presidency

The rose by another name

Trying to overturn a free and fair election

The rose by another name

Defeating radical Islam

The rose by another name

Congress must stop death by decree

The rose by another name

The cyberhacking to come

The rose by another name

How the market can fix health care

The rose by another name

When the high-minded stoop to the low-down

The rose by another name

The U.S.-Israel economic bond

The rose by another name

Swamp creature Richard Cordray must go

The rose by another name

Why California’s mining ban is against the law

The rose by another name

The Russia conundrum

The rose by another name

Justice for Reagan Tokes, slain Ohio State University student

The rose by another name

The three-headed hydra of the Middle East

The rose by another name

The CIA’s affront to Trump

The rose by another name

Intellectual honesty and political indifference

The rose by another name

ISIS drones could target Europe

The rose by another name

North Korea, the real threat

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

bestworldpro